Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/7/21 David Endicott <dendicott@xxxxxxxxx>:
> It is my opinion that name resolution (however done) is outside the purview
> of WS.   It may be handled in any number of ways by the client, and must
> happen *before* WS establishes it's TCP connection and begins handshaking.
> DNS, DNS SRV, etc. are good and useful tools, but are not part of WS.
> A document showing how to use DNS SRV with WS would be useful, but it's not
> part of the core WS spec.

Ok, there you have a proposal:

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ibc-websocket-dns-srv-02

:)

Of course, the core WS spec should reference and *mandate* it, or
maybe not and instead a W3C specification should mandate it for
webbrowsers.
And in this case, the WS URI resolution section in core WS spec (DNS A
stuff) should be entirely removed.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]