Re: Another look at 6to4 (and other IPv6 transition issues)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 18, 2011, at 3:30 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

On Jul 18, 2011, at 24:36 , Roger Jørgensen wrote:

My wild guess is that the ISP will sooner or later stop routing the entire 2002::/16 block...

You mean, your wild guess is service providers will unilaterally implement the phase-out plan I proposed as a standards action.

Why not just sign up for a standard phase-out plan?  Don't we want 6to4 users to have any advanced notice that we plan to break their Internet?  Or, is the idea that we don't believe we can achieve a tactical victory over 6to4 users unless we mount a surprise attack on them?

I don't understand the desire for a phase out plan when there's nothing better to phase in that's generally available.    

Preferring IPv4 to 6to4 makes sense.     But filtering 6to4 traffic or its routing advertisements is a denial-of-service attack.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]