On 07/13/2011 09:57 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Dear Erminio, I'd point that the scope of G.8113.1, a.k.a G.tpoam in regard to CCM is even more narrow then of the document being discussed. The G.8113.1 addresses only bi-directional co-routed LSP and has no model to handle bi-directional associated LSP in independent mode. And unidirectional p2p and p2mp LSPs are not addressed by the current revision of the G.8113.1. Can all these out-of-scope constructs be used to conclude that G.8113.1 is not capable to solve these issues? I don't think so. Solutions are not readily available, that's all.
Can you guys all drop the ietf-announce list from this thread, please? This list is not for technical discussions. Thanks.
-- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | SIP: kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf