On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:39:17 -0400, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> said: > > >> Ooh, I like this proposal. We can also have noise-types for > >> exhortations to not print the email. > > JCK> If one starts down that path, there is a real possibility for a > JCK> semantically-rich environment. For example, consider a noise > JCK> type for flaming, repetitive, responses to a topic on the IETF > JCK> list. One could also very efficiently reflect what I assume was > JCK> the intent of a recent observation on the list with > JCK> noise-type="hitler" :-( > > Obviously we need to take a typical step back first and determine the > scope of the problem. We need to commission a "requirements for noise" > ID first. Can we schedule a BOF? Perhaps a symbolic burning of notices? Dave Morris _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf