On 7/13/11 5:35 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Personally, I think Informational is most appropriate (and probably > easier), but a paragraph or two of context, as well as corresponding > adjustments, would work as well. Personally I'm not wedded to Standards Track for this document, and neither are the authors. I just want to make sure that there's a good reason to change it from Standards Track to Informational. IMHO "this document doesn't solve the problem in the most generic way" would prevent us from publishing a rather large number of specifications on the Standards Track. There's nothing evil about scoping a document so that it solves a more particular problem. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf