Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > We quite often discuss here how to judge rough consensus. That issue turns up most of the time in inappropriate situations. I regularly see folks _counting_ opinions when issues have been raised instead of actually resolving the issues. As previously said, the most important thing is to drill down and sort out matters of personal taste from issues are technical or procedural. Matters of personal taste can be settled by signficant majority, and "rough" applies almost exclusively to issues of personal taste. Technical and procedural issues need to be addressed with an issue resolution process, where alternatives are seriously evaluated. Here is a snipped from an IESG response to an appeal: However, several ADs felt that the issue was technical, not stylistic, thus the IESG as a whole did not have consensus that the issue was non-technical in this case. Trying to gauge "(rough) consensus" by counting voiced opinions when an issue has not been reliably determined to be non-technical and non-procedural _is_ inappropriate. At least that is what I believe that the IESG thought a couple of years ago. -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf