Re: Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian - thanks for your review and comments.

- Ralph

On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:45 PM 6/10/11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Ralph,
> 
> As far as I can tell this seems to describe some sort of a Layer 2 stateful
> per-flow QoS mechanism using new Ethertype headers. As such I don't see why
> the IETF would care. The point of it escapes me, since we have plenty of reason
> to believe that such solutions are impractical and do not scale, but that doesn't
> seem like our problem.
> 
> I only looked at this to check if it impacted current work in 6MAN on
> the IPv6 Flow Label, and there doesn't appear to be any impact or relevance.
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 2011-06-08 08:27, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> The IETF has recently received a liaison from ITU-T Q5/SG-11 regarding a Draft Recommendation.  That liaison is available as https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1054/.  The official liaison is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1232.pdf.
>> 
>> The liaison asks for IETF review of Draft Recommendation "Signalling protocols and procedures relating to Flow State Aware QoS control in a bounded sub-network of a NGN", which is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1231.pdf.  This note opens an IETF comment period on the document, ending midnight, anywhere on earth, 2011/7/5.  After the comment period, a summary will be prepared and returned in a liaison to ITU-T Q5/SG-11.
>> 
>> Of specific interest to the IETF are any ways in which the "signalling protocols and procedures" defined in the Draft Recommendation might interact with existing IETF Internet protocols.  We are especially interested in potential adverse interactions or interference with IETF Internet protocols.  The technical merits of the "signalling protocols and procedures" defined in the Draft Recommendation are of interest inasmuch as the IETF community might provide technical advice and recommendations to improve the Draft Recommendation itself.
>> 
>> Please respond with any comments on the Draft Recommendation to ietf@xxxxxxxxx  Thanks in advance for your review of the Draft Recommendation.
>> 
>> - Ralph Droms, Internet Area Director
>>  for the IESG
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]