Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In a similar way as Geoff measured 6to4 - looking at SYNs. I suspect that
> the answer will be that much fewer users have configured tunnels than 6to4,
> and that the failure rate is much lower.

Er, I'm currently on 2001:388:f000::xxxx
Do you have an algorithm that will tell you whether that is native
or a configured tunnel?

Not perfectly. But you can look at things like MSS and MTU. 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]