> Nothing in the definition of BCPs require that it be limited to > covering existing practice. Well, other than the naive assumption that something called a Best Current Practices would in fact document best current practices. But since this argument seems to be all about proving that we've followed the official process rather than about publishing something accurate and useful rather than speculative and misleading, who cares? Now that I understand the rules, I plan to publish all of my experiments as BCPs. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf