Hello, This draft, Section 8 says: Options may be added to this list either as a result of protocol action or expert review. Expert review may either be in the form of a working group review and consensus call, or IESG review in consultation with the DHC working group chair or chairs. which is very obscure. Reading this text, I suppose you wanted this to be an 'IETF Consensus' policy of RFC 5226 for adding the entries to the sub-registry. Please consider such text: New entries SHALL be added to the registry following the 'IETF Consensus' policy, defined in RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. and adding the normative reference to RFC 5226. Mykyta Yevstifeyev 2011/5/18, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>: > > The IESG has received a request from the Dynamic Host Configuration WG > (dhc) to consider the following document: > - 'Relay-Supplied DHCP Options' > <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-06.txt> as a Proposed > Standard > > > [ . . . ] > > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf