Re: Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Doug,
At 16:56 04-05-2011, Doug Barton wrote:
"Blessed" is rather strong. There are a non-zero number of people in both groups (of which I am one) who don't like the draft, and don't agree that documenting bad ideas is its own virtue.

If I have to go by the document shepherd write-up, only one person expressed discontent about this proposal, hence the above comment.

[snip]

Meanwhile, the discussion about whether or not to call this "whitelisting" is pointless. The term is already well-established.

No comment for obvious reasons.

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]