On 5/6/2011 9:01 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I think he is saying that there is are _de facto_ criteria that are neither called out in 2026 nor in this draft, and that those criteria are the running code, so the documentation ought to be made to match.
Oh. But then that doesn't mean that the /current/ draft lowers quality but that the existing process has exhibited the lower.
In that case, it seems like the concrete way to resolve such concerns is to propose specific text to add to the current draft?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf