At 9:27 AM -0400 4/17/11, John C Klensin wrote:
Steve,
Two things:
(1) Given the variable amount of time it takes to get RFCs
issued/ published after IESG signoff, are you and the WG sure
that you want to tie the phases of the phase-in procedure to RFC
publication?
It probably would help if the IESG coordinated with the RFC Editor to
try to avoid having any problems here. But, we anticipate that the
durations for the phases will be long enough so that a few months in
the RFC editor's queue can be managed.
(2) There is an incomplete sentence at the end of (2): "This
allows CAs to issue certificates under" (more context below).
john
Whoops. The final sentence should be:
This allows CAs to issue certificates under the new format before all
relying parties are prepared to process that format.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf