Can the RFC Production Center remind us about what the actual numbers are, and also whether they ever generate an XML version if the authors didn't supply one? Julian's numbers are good approximations; 50-60% of docs have XML source files. The Production Center does not create XML files. We process XML files when XML source files are provided to us. Thanks, Sandy for the RFC Production Center From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: February 23, 2011 5:09:54 AM EST To: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx, IAOC <iaoc@xxxxxxxx>, IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: RFC production center XML format usage, was: [IAOC] xml2rfc and legal services RFPs On 23.02.2011 10:46, Julian Reschke wrote: On 22.02.2011 17:18, Russ Housley wrote: There are many tools used by I-D authors, including nroff/troff/groff, NroffEdit, MS Word templates, LaTex, and a plethora of editors. The IETF cannot take on every tool that seems popular. Isn't the statistic of xml2rfc use somewhere around 50-60%? Roughly half. Again, that is why there is a value to the RFC Production Center. ... Can the RFC Production Center remind us about what the actual numbers are, and also whether they ever generate an XML version if the authors didn't supply one? ... I just realized that I have an archive of XML versions of RFCs in AUTH48 state; so I *can* report the percentage of XML versions since ~RFC5000. Note that these may be inaccurate (for instance, not all RFC numbers get assigned, right?); it just observes how much XML files ended up in AUTH48. Here are the numbers: RFC5000 - RFC5099: 41 RFC5100 - RFC5199: 44 RFC5200 - RFC5299: 47 RFC5300 - RFC5399: 48 RFC5400 - RFC5499: 64 RFC5500 - RFC5599: 59 RFC5600 - RFC5699: 58 RFC5700 - RFC5799: 64 RFC5800 - RFC5899: 63 RFC5900 - RFC5999: 68 RFC6000 - RFC6099: 69 Best regards, Julian |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf