Hi, On 2011-2-3, at 17:03, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > While I fully agree with what this document proposes. This might be an editorial comment but I 've noticed that RFC 1072 is not mentioned to be made Historic despite the option specified by it is made obsolete. you mean it's missing from Section 2? Good catch. I'll add that in my working copy. > What is more, referencing all the documents made obsolete normatively is OK? Here I suggest only RFC 4614 to be mentioned in this way. I guess they could become informative references, but you could also argue that they are required background reading and hence should be normative. Lars
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf