Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Procedures forthe Management of the Service Nameand Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus.westerlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>;  "IESG IESG" <iesg@xxxxxxxx>; "IETF
discussion list" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:01 PM

> On 2/1/11 2:14 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> > Cullen Jennings skrev 2011-01-31 18:44:
> >>

<snip>.
>
> Some people say "it doesn't appear that the actual level of security
> provided is different if you are forced to use one port or two" and
> others disagree.

This did get a thorough airing on the TLS list
in the second week of November
"[TLS] Security concerns around co-locating TLS and non-secure on same port
(WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08)"

As Paul said, some say yea and others nay.

Tom Petch

> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]