This post would be much less confusing if you would name names, cite examples, and point fingers. > The reason why so many documents are at proposed is that they're > often collections of bloat (limited-use features with an aggresive > requirements level) from various interest groups that is > not strictly necessary for a protocol to be useful, and sometimes > used only by a minority. > > Normally, for progression from Proposed to Draft, > > Â - some of the MUSTs would have to be changed to SHOULDs, > Â - some of the SHOULDs would have to be changed to MAYs, > Â - some parts might better be moved to seperate, optional > Â Â extensions documents > > But the particular interest groups would rather have the document > remain at Proposed than seeing any of the requirements level of > those particular features they're interested in, to come out lowered, > or see features removed from the base protocol and into a > seperate extensions document. > > > This is one of the reasons why there is a constant stream of new > authentication protocols. > > > -Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf