Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (InternetAssigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Managementof the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port NumberRegistry) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-1-27, at 18:58, t.petch wrote:
> And what happens when we have ProtocolX over SSH and ProtocolX over TLS?
> 
> Must they share a port, with ProtocolX, which has been quietly using its
> assigned port for
> 20 years?

No. The expert reviewer can obviously assign a second port in that case (if ProtocolX doesn't have a feature negotiation capability built in so that the port could be shared.)

But we don't want to allocate multiple ports for the different security flavors of *new* protocols. At least we want this to be the exception.

The expert team is (from what I hear) seeing frequent applications that look like "Hi, we're company X and our foo protocol runs on TCP. We'd like a port for that, and one for when we run foo over TLS."

Lars

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]