Hello all, I am writing to comment draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01, that is currently in Last Call. I've noticed that there is no clear definition of the created IANA regsitry, as defined by RFC 5226. Among other, there is no clear definition of registry format and initial values. I'd like to propose you to take RFC 5797 as a base for registry desription. That IANA considerations section present in the current version is unsuitable for Standards Track doc., IMO. Moreover, as a minor note, there are no all abbreviations explained once they appear in title, abstract and main text. So I'd like the authors to correct this upon the end of LC. All the best, Mykyta 2011/1/18, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Special-Use Domain Names' > <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > Abstract > > This document describes what it means to say that a DNS name is > reserved for special use, when reserving such a name is appropriate, > and the procedure for doing so. > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-02-14. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf