----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx>; "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@xxxxxxxxx>; <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:02 PM On 2011-1-18, at 15:58, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > Lars can speak for himself, but what I THOUGHT he was talking was changing the phrase "unassigned" to something like "reserved for future assignment". Exactly. <tp> Which, presumably, would be in a BCP updating RFC5226 which only allows for Private Use: Experimental: Reserved: Not to be assigned. Unassigned: Unused and available for assignment via documented procedures. Tom Petch </tp> Lars _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf