On 13.01.2011 10:21, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Hello all,
Let me cite RFC 5226, that says:
<...>
Documents that create a new namespace (or modify the definition of an
existing space) and that expect IANA to play a role in maintaining
that space (e.g., serving as a repository for registered values) MUST
provide clear instructions on details of the namespace. In
particular, instructions *MUST* include:
<...>
5) Initial assignments and reservations. Clear instructions should be
provided to identify any initial assignments or registrations. In
addition, any ranges that are to be reserved for "Private Use",
"Reserved", *"Unassigned"*, etc. should be *clearly indicated*.
<...>
...
That sounds like an editorial error to me.
"any ranges to be *reserved* for .... "Unassigned"..."
doesn't make any sense at all. They are not reserved.
This should probably be raised as erratum.
So the document specifying the regsitry MUST mention what are
Unassigned. Moreover, IMO, it would be useful to assign one value for
Experimentation.
No. should != must.
There are tons of registries where this is not the case; namely all or
most of those where the values are strings, not numbers.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf