+1 --On Friday, January 07, 2011 09:15 -0500 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not keen to start a language war, but. . . > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:39:37AM +0200, Mykyta Yevstifeyev > wrote: > >> Moreover, 'obsoleted' means the same as 'deprecated' or >> 'non-current' (see >> http://www.synonym.com/synonyms/obsolete/ or >> http://dictionary.sensagent.com/obsolete/en-en/#synonyms). So >> it is a problem in RFC2026. > > . . .I fully disagree with that, regardless of what those > claims of synonymy say. To deprecate something is to express > disapproval. To mark something as obsolete doesn't do that; > it merely says that the marked thing is outdated. There is a > useful distinction here worth maintaining. > > A _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf