Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

 

Document: draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

 

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date: 2010-11-28

IETF LC End Date: 2010-12-3

IESG Telechat date: (if known)

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. There are some nits and minor issue.

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues: The example in appendix A are using syntax with no reference. The text says that this is non normative text but I think that it will be good to have a reference to the document where the correct syntax is specified

 

Nits/editorial comments:

 

1.      The first sentence of section 1 "Modern router architecture design maintains a strict separation of forwarding and routing control plane hardware and software." Talks about routing control plane while the next sentence and the rest of the document calls it "router control plane"

2.      In section 2 third paragraph "Additionally, there may be other vendor or implementation specific protection mechanisms that are on by default or always on. ". I suggest changing the text "are on" and "always on" maybe to "active" or "turned on".

 

Thanks

Roni Even

 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]