On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> While section 2.3 of draft-iab-extension-recs-02 can be read as very vaguely pointing away from this kind of extension ("[S]pecifications that look very similar to the original but don't interoperate with each other or with the original - are even more harmful to interoperability than extensions"), it appears to be aimed more squarely at the creation of protocol profiles by SDOs other than the IETF.
well, we could discuss the use of an IETF session setup protocol for instant messaging, and the use of a protocol designed to add attributes and report on available bandwidth within a class of traffic on a standard (eg, calculated by a routing protocol) route to install a route. We do it to ourselves as well.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf