Earlier, Paul Hoffman wrote in reply to Rene Struik: > The changes you propose have serious IPR considerations > that are not present in the current document. If you want > to propose IPR-laden optimizations, it is better to do so > as a separate document so implementers can see the differences > easily. +1 Also, it is important to keep any proposed changes separate so that the IETF can clearly understand the IPR implications of those proposed changes (e.g., those proposed by Rene Struik). IMHO, the IETF should avoid IPR issues where that is possible and practical. Yours, Ran _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf