RE: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

    > is my understanding that IETF consensus is to have the industry
    > transition from IPv4 to IPv6.

That's certainly the formal IETF _position_ - whether it's the _consensus_ of
the IETF participants is another matter.

Ever since the original IPv6 decision, over 16 years ago (the Toronto IETF -
July, 1994), there has been a very considerable group of people who
disagreed. Whether or not it was large enough to be considered 'rough
consensus' is, I suspect, in the eye of the beholder.


And of course the position of the users of the network is yet another
question entirely.

So far, in that 16-year period (we're shortly going to have IETF participants
who _weren't even born yet_ when the IETF 'picked' IPv6), they have shown
little inclination to consume the dog-food.

Will the next couple of years see much change there? We'll see.

	Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]