At first, would you like to confirm the protocol is rgiht or wrong,
according to the constitutions of each nation.
It's the matter of right or wrong, not legal or illegal, isn't it?
---
TaddyHatty, ã
----- Original Message -----
From: "Masataka Ohta" <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mrex@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <hallam@xxxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6
Martin Rex wrote:
According to your theory, a universal NAT traversal protocol
should already exists.
Correct. It is called the HTTP CONNECT method.
If, with your definition of "traversal", tunneling is a form
of traversal, tunneling by IPSEC is a standard firewall
traversal protocol and is much better than HTTP CONNECT
because of UDP.
So, we are done.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf