Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yoav Nir wrote:

> Why not?  While I agree that firewalls are diverse, they are all
> made by vendors, and the big firewall vendors all have employees
> who participate in the IETF. An IETF standard that allows firewall
> traversal for legitimate traffic is very likely to be adopted by
> all the vendors. It might not work with some bargain basement
> home router you get at Wallmart, but even they eventually get
> updated software.

According to your theory, a universal NAT traversal protocol
should already exists.

						Masataka Ohta


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]