On 11/13/10 12:01 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > For protocol specs, our normal way to sort of competing and > variant proposals is to form a WG. We know that doesn't work > well for procedural documents. > > Partially as an experiment, would you consider creating a > separate list, pointing the discussion there, and appointing a > rapporteur or two with responsibility for figuring out when > discussions have stabilized and then coming back to the IETF > list with a summary of that stability point, tradeoffs, etc.? > Call it what you will, this sounds like NEWTRK revisited. What will be different? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf