Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Saturday, 13 November, 2010 07:35 +0800 Dave CROCKER
<dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/13/2010 7:01 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> We've now got your/the IESG's two-step proposal, Dave's
>> alternative, discussions about going directly to single step,
> 
> 
> Single step???
> 
> That's not the alternative proposal that we put forward.  It
> is an alternative two step:

Sorry Dave.  At the end of an IETF week, I guess we are all
tired.  Please note the comma and parse that as
 - the IESG's two-step proposal,
 - Dave's alternative [two-step proposal],
 - discussions about going directly to single-step,
 -    [...]

  john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]