Like others that have chimed in, I'm just concerned that it will be difficult to attend multiple BOFs of interest if they're all scheduled against each other. Cheers, Andy On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Harrington <ietfdbh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > part of the justification is to have the BOF early in the week so > people can discuss it during the week. > > dbh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: iesg-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:iesg-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Richard L. Barnes >> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:29 AM >> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx >> Cc: wgchairs@xxxxxxxx; The IESG >> Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment >> >> If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that >> make the >> attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest? >> >> >> >> On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote: >> > The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling >> experiment. The >> > goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and >> also provide >> > more time to craft BOF proposals. >> > >> > The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, >> schedule all BOFs >> > for Monday afternoon. Second, schedule WGs before we know >> which BOFs will >> > be held. Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF >> > proposal to ADs. >> > >> > Please let us know whether you support this experiment. >> Discussion is >> > welcome on the mail list and the plenary on Wednesday evening. >> > >> > On behalf of the IESG, >> > Russ Housley >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf