RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



________________________________________
From: wgchairs-bounces@xxxxxxxx [wgchairs-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Russ Housley [housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

The deadline for BOF requests comes too soon after the end of one IETF
meeting for the next one.  We are hearing complaints, and subjectively,
the quality of the request write-ups do reflect this situation.  So, yes,
the intent is to allow more time by shifting the BOF request deadline.
_________________________________________

I would think that the more formal the session, the longer in advance that the need for the session will be reliably predicted.  Since BOFs are less formal, the deadline for them should be *later* than for WG sessions, preferably very shortly before the IETF meeting.

Dale
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]