James> perhaps this needs to be stated (that the Type 4 is created by this James> doc for your purpose)? I think the doc already makes this clear, maybe I'm not sure what you are asking. James> You can probably imagine how many SIP and RSVP protocol extensions James> there are (70+ and about 20 respectively off the top of my head), and James> yet every one of them have to state "Session Initiation Protocol James> (SIP)" and "ReSource ReserVation Protocol (version-1) (RSVPv1)" the James> first time they appear, no matter how big the community of interest James> is. And this makes sense to you? Okay, I will expand the occurrence of "S-PMSI" in the abstract. On the issue of the maximum UDP packet size, I think that is an implementation issue and I don't think it is appropriate to raise it in this document. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf