On 10/28/2010 9:22 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote:
ost times it would be better if IETF WGs initially create an Experimental status RFC, possibly doing so quite rapidly, and then later revise that (based on at experience) and publish the revision on the IETF standards-track.
1. Getting /any/ RFC through the IETF process is very high overhead, including Experimental.
2. Why does what you've suggested not qualify for the IRTF rather than the IETF? Shouldn't a standards process be able to sit down and do a standard, rather than iterate on experimental designs?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf