I'll take the contrarian position. Demonstrate to me that the barriers for PS really are higher than they used to be. - Ralph On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:39 AM 10/26/10, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 26.10.2010 16:31, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> ... >> This seems to be the core idea driving support for this specification. >> >> Unfortunately, there is nothing in the proposed change that will affect >> this goal. >> >> The idea seems to be that "simplifying" the later part of the labeling >> model will somehow cause those controlling production of an initial >> version of a spec to get it produced more quickly. >> ... > > Maybe some of the current IESG members could offer their opinion about *why* the barriers for PS appear to be much higher than they used to be? > > Best regards, Julian > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf