On Oct 27, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Bob Braden wrote: > > > > In this environment, the only thing that seems to make sense is for WGs > to start usually at Experimental (someone else suggested this, I > apologize for not recalling who it was). You might mean me. But having authored 2 experimental RFCs, one informational and one PS, I did not get a feeling that the bar was any different between the levels. The only difference was that without implementations, the ADs preferred Experimental to PS. The review process was no different, though. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf