On 2010-10-27, at 2:10, John Leslie wrote: > I'm quite certain the IESG doesn't have such a blanket policy. Correct (of course). > The reported incident _may_ be accurate, but such a requirement > would have come from the WG Chair, not the responsible AD, least of > all some other AD. I'd be very surprised if this incident turns out > to be anything more than a WGC (who may _also_ be an AD) requiring > implementation reports for a single I-D proposed for adoption. In this case, James was the author *and* is the WG chair. This is why I got involved as AD. Lars
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf