>>>>> "Scott" == Scott O Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> The known problem is it takes well over four years to get anything
>> published.
Scott> ...
>> What I *am* hoping is that with two, clearly defined maturity levels, we
>> can go back to publishing Proposed Standards in about a year
Scott> the only way that could happen is if the IESG were to change their ways a lot
Scott> and permit less complete documents to be published as PS
so, from this point of view, two-maturity is a step backwards, because
it makes the new PS seem even more 'mature', and therefore higher
barrier to entry. I don't have an answer for this.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf