Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Masataka,

>> In the interest of fair and balanced discussion.
> 
> It is of course that, merely because IPv6 makes IPsec mandatory,
> IPv6 can not be more secure than IPv4.

That was indeed the point of that slide. -- that aside, IPsec is a
"SHOULD" (rather than a "MUST") in the latest node-reqs-bis document

[....]
> For the end to end security, only the end systems requiring the
> security are required to deploy mechanisms for the security,
> which means it is not necessary to mandate all the end systems
> deploy some security protocol.

Sorry, I couldn't parse this paragraph. Could you clarify this one?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx || fgont@xxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]