Hi Jon On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Peterson, Jon wrote:
I wouldnât say that the message of the dns-applications draft is âdo not charter E2MD,â in so far as it does not reject the problem space. It does try to capture arguments that had previously only been presented anecdotally, and it moreover intends in the future to capture the ongoing discussions weâve now begun about these subjects. I do however maintain that the previous E2MD chater is a collection of problems that have different underlying requirements, and that bringing them under a common architectural umbrella may obscure their individual problem spaces rather than illuminating them. Also, the insistence of the charter on DNS-based solutions, as opposed to solutions that might not involve the DNS, seemed unnecessarily confining, for send-n and other mechanisms under consideration.
Which E2MD charter do you refer to in this part of your email? Is it the one we prepared for Maastricht (IETF-78) as publised on: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki/ProposedCharter or some older version or even both? May I ask you clarify this. cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf