Glen Zorn [mailto://gwz@xxxxxxxxxxx] writes: ... > > My apologies, I was mistakingly believing that the previous > discussions > > on this topic had lead to the adoption of Route-Record AVPs in > answers. > > I'm not at all sure that you were mistaken about that, but no such > decision > has been reflected in the draft. Sorry, I should have been more specific: what I _meant_ was "reflected in RFC3588bis". .. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf