Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/10 7:40 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
> 
> Le 9 oct. 2010 à 02:50, Fred Baker a écrit :
>>> That's not limited to Germany. Would that dtag.de would use 172.16/12 rather than 10/8 or 192.168/16, as the latter two seem to find their way into so many home configurations.
> 
> 
>> Having the same prefix on each side of the residential NAT could be a real pain...
> 
> With my understanding of how NATs work, I don't see why.
> Could you elaborate?

I can cause problems, it doesn't have to... there's a reason why nat
rewriting occurs before forwarding in for example linux iptables.

if you expect to connect to host in a overlapping assignment you're
going to have a problem but I think that's assumed.

> Regards,
> RD
> 
> 
>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Peter and Karin Dambier
>>> Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
>>> Rimbacher Strasse 16
>>> D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
>>> +49(6209)795-816 (Telekom)
>>> +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
>>> mail: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.peter-dambier.de/
>>> http://iason.site.voila.fr/
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
>>> ULA= fd80:4ce1:c66a::/48
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ietf mailing list
>>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]