Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <9286.1286931928@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Richardson writes:
> 
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Andrews <marka@xxxxxxx> writes:
>     Mark> In message
>     Mark> <992DF93E-1EFB-4D68-BDD7-D5C7BE02FC01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>     Mark> Marshall Euba nks writes:
>     >> Hello;
>     >> 
>     >> I think that people here would be interested in (and likely
>     >> concerned by) the ARIN 2010-9 proposal :
>     >> 
>     >> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2010_9.html
>     >> 
>     >> "On 15 July 2010 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) selected "IPv6
>     >> for 6rd" as a draft policy for adoption discussion on the PPML
>     >> and at the Public Policy Meeting in Atlanta in October.
>     >> 
>     >> IPv6 for 6rd
>     >> 
>     >> 6rd is an incremental method for Service Providers to deploy
>     >> IPv6, defined in the IETF Standards Track RFC 5969. 6rd has been
>     >> used successfully by a number of service providers to deploy IPv6
>     >> based on automatic IPv6 prefix delegation and tunneling over
>     >> existing IPv4 infrastructure. .... "
>     >> 
>     >> What worries me (and others) is that to give end users an IPv6
>     >> /56 will generally require the assignments as short as /24s to
>     >> ISPs, due to the encapsulation of v4 addresses inside of v6
>     >> addresses :
>     >> 
>     >> "The 6rd prefix is an RIR delegated IPv6 prefix. It must
>     >> encapsulate an IPv4 address and must be short enough so that a
>     >> /56 or /60 can be given to subscribers."
>     >> 
>     >> 56 - 32 = a /24
> 
>     Mark> Only a naive deployment of 6rd would do this.
> 
>     Mark> If you deploy a 6rd prefix per IPv4 prefix you have allocated
>     Mark> and set appropriate IPv4 mask lengths in your DHCP replies to
> 
> I tried to raise this point in April at the ARIN meeting, but it wasn't
> understood. 

Deploying 6rd in parallel with native basically doubles the amount
of IPv6 space required for simple deployments.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]