Hi Ted, > Thanks for your message and your consideration of the points I raised. > Given the > scope of changes below, my first suggestion is that the author team actually > go ahead with a draft incorporating these changes, so that we can discuss > based on the actual text. I also suspect that a second last call will > be necessary as > a result. the plan is to give the authors some time to discuss with all of you who sent comments on the draft so that the authors understand how to address them. Depending on the nature of the changes needed, we may need to IETF LC it again (as you suggest above) or even let the WG have an additional look at it. But for now, thanks for following this up. Cheers, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf