RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 7:42 PM +0100 8/30/10, Dave Cridland wrote:

I would note that these items are precisely the kinds of things that we, as an organization, are utterly ill-equipped to handle. We cannot use our tried and tested bureaucratic techniques to mitigate time-consuming discussion - we cannot insist people write a draft, propose a BOF, etc before actually discussing the issue.

Therefore, I suggest - and quite seriously, as I assure you I would never joke about something so serious as this - that a new area be formed forthwith to tackle what's obviously more important than any mere technical issue. This new area - perhaps entitled the Hotel Organizational Logistic Strategies area, could be home to a number of key working groups, aimed at solving these fundamental issues that plague us all.

Well, we have in the past dealt with process and organizational issues using a WG (although I can't recall which area). But I'm not sure we need a new area.

--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
If you attack stupidity you attack an entrenched interest with friends
in government and every walk of public life, and you will make small
progress against it.                               --Samuel Marchbanks
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]