Re: Is this true?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/26/2010 2:27 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
  Apart from that, it's scare-mongering. Consider that
the basic model for IPv6 is not fundamentally different than IPv4;
why would the underlying security vulnerabilities be fundamentally
different?


well, just to give that question its due, interesting changes in details can sometimes produce interesting changes in the behavior of a model and therefore of its implications.

in this case, the vastly larger address space of IPv6 permits attackers to switch to new addresses at a rate that was not possible with IPv4. this is likely to defeat the substantial infrastructure of attack-tracking that is address-based, such as for anti-spam.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]