At 14:56 20-08-10, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG (opsec) to consider the following document: - 'Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Best Practices for Routing Protocols' <draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-00.txt> as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
If it was the view of the opsec WG that this document represents best practices, it could have chosen an intended status of BCP instead of Informational. Quoting Section 8:
"We expect that new revisions of this document will be issued in the future to reflect current thinking on best practice in this area." Does this document reflect best practice in this area? As a nit, there are two occurrences of the RFC2119 boilerplate. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf