Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-00.txt> (Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Best Practices for Routing Protocols) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 14:56 20-08-10, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Operational Security
Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG (opsec) to consider the
following document:
- 'Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Best Practices
   for Routing Protocols'
  <draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-00.txt> as an Informational
RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the

If it was the view of the opsec WG that this document represents best practices, it could have chosen an intended status of BCP instead of Informational. Quoting Section 8:

  "We expect that new revisions of this document will be issued
   in the future to reflect current thinking on best practice
   in this area."

Does this document reflect best practice in this area?

As a nit, there are two occurrences of the RFC2119 boilerplate.

Regards,
-sm


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]