Hmm... folding Australia into Asia, Africa into Europe and S America into N America (for discussion purposes only) that's roughly
1/1/1.7 as a ratio. (Asia/Europe/NA). Or 4/4/7.
It will be interesting to see what the other runs of the data show.
Mike
At 07:49 PM 8/7/2010, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Assuming the very simple model that attendance consists of a fixed number of constant attendees from each continent plus a "continentally local" variable number that only show up when the IETF meets on their continent and using the very limited data provided, using a rough least squares fit I get the following:
Constant Attendees
Africa 6
Asia 236
Europe 254
N.America 409
Australia 14
S.America 8
Continentally Local Attendees
Asia 333
Europe 173
N.America 232
Thanks,
Donald
==================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
155 Beaver Street
Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- During my IAOC chair plenary talk at IETF78 (slides are in the proceedings) I asked a question about continuing the current meeting policy (3 in North America, 2 in Europe, 1 in Asia in two year period (3-2-1) ) or changing to a 1-1-1 policy based on current meeting attendance. The talk included a graph of attendance by continent for IETF72-IETF78. I was asked to provide this data to the community.
- It is attached. It includes the raw data and a new graph that shows attendance by percentage. It appears to me that a 1-1-1 meeting policy is justified by current overall IETF meeting attendance.
- Your comments are appreciated.
- Bob
- _______________________________________________
- Ietf mailing list
- Ietf@xxxxxxxx
- https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf