Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A lot of the application code I've seen could be described as "second-guess one or more TCP timers, add pepper and salt, serve as desired". The second half of that is obviously not amenable to standardisation. The TCP stack cannot take any action. But the first part seems more... reasonable. I think the TCP stack can inform the application of its state, better than it does via the APIs I know.

Of course it's a local matter, not really IETFish. Where is the boundary these days? Didn't some RFC extend the Berkeley sockets API for v6?

Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]