Re: Towards consensus on document format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16.03.2010 14:14, Doug Ewell wrote:
>>
>> Brian E Carpenter <brian dot e dot carpenter at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Note that I am not arguing in favor of plain text as the IETF
>>>> standard. I just want to keep this part of the discussion real. There
>>>> is no requirement anywhere that plain-text files may contain only
>>>> ASCII characters.
>>>
>>> That requirement is explicit for RFCs.
>>
>> It is explicit for RFCs, but not for plain-text files in general. IETF
>> could theoretically change the RFC requirement, although you are correct
>> that given the non-acceptance of draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs, it seems
>> unlikely. The topic did come up again on the list, with the usual
>> conflation of "ASCII" and "plain text."
>
> Indeed.
>
> Speaking of which: did we ever *measure* the acceptance of
> draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs? As far as I recall, there was lots of support for
> it.

Some people are more equal than others.

-- 
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]